Foreclosure Outlook 2005: Bubble
Trouble
Year 2004 will probably be remembered as one the finest years in the real estate market
of the U.S. As we pointed in our Foreclosure Outlook: 2004, low mortgage interest rates
have helped fuel the soaring home values. According, to the research of the Office of Federal
Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), the average year-over-year increase in home prices throughout
United States was 12.97% from the third quarter of 2003 through the third quarter of 2004.

Source: OFHEO
In his report, Mr. Armando Falcon Jr.,
Director of OFHEO makes an important observation. He states
that “the appreciation reflected in this quarter’s report
shows further acceleration from (an) already rapid increase;
(and) the growth in house prices over the past year surpasses
any increase in 25 years.”
Several factors could be playing into
these elevated numbers. One possibility is that even though
the short-term rate has been rising this year; the long-term
interest rate to which mortgage rate is pegged has remained
below the 6% mark. These low rates continue to bolster home
buying at attractive levels. Another factor affecting the high
home price numbers is the end of the refinancing boom;
refinancing loans in the current quarter fell well below
recent levels. Such loans with low loan-to-value ratios were
made only to refinance existing loans (non-cash-out loans);
hence, they may have not captured the true increase in home
sale prices as experienced in the third quarter of
2004.
A review of the table below shows that less than twenty states had returns above the US national
average, while the other states did not even keep up with the national average. In cities like
Las Vegas, NV homes gained a stunning 41.74% last year. This increase can be attributed to people
relocating to cities where the job market has been strong during the last few years. In some
Northeastern states, specifically in the Washington D.C. area, home prices jumped 24.01% because
of a strong job market and also due to higher spending by the federal government.

Source: OFHEO
By contrast cities with higher
unemployment rates and sluggish growth lagged the national
average. Cities like Anderson, SC and Austin, TX staged growth
rates well below the national average.
Such discoveries confirm the notion that
inflated home values are not rampant throughout the country,
but rather limited to certain states or major metropolises.
Hence, if there is a bubble it is localized and regional, but
not national.
In a different study reported in
MSNMoney.com
Edward Learner, a UCLA Economist looked at home price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) levels to see if the home values were overpriced. He used the same concept used by stock investors to measure stock valuations based on P/E ratios. His findings were as follows:
• In Boston,
the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30;
compared with just under 20 in 1988.
• San
Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed,
with the P/E currently at just over 27.
• San Diego’s
current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
• New York, by
contrast, was significantly below previous peaks. The area’s
current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993,
but down from 28.6 in 1988.
As Learner
pointed out, knowledge of the exact P/E is not critical, what
is important is the extreme between price and the underlying
value of home, as measured by their market rents. Hence, when
area P/Es get to elevated levels therein lies the potential
for a bubble.
Following are some of the P/E valuations
in major cities across the US.
| Home
P / E ratios for 9 metro areas |
| |
Avg.
1988-2000 |
2001 |
| Boston |
20.5 |
30.2 |
| San Diego |
22.8 |
29.7 |
| San Francisco |
23.8 |
27.2 |
| Los Angeles |
21.3 |
25.6 |
| Seattle |
20.4 |
25 |
| Denver |
17.7 |
23.7 |
| New York |
21.2 |
22.5 |
| Chicago |
17.2 |
20.8 |
| Washington, D.C. |
17.1 |
20.4 |
Source: MSNMoney.com
Mr. Learner’s
research substantiates the findings of the OFHEO; over
valuations are not all across the US, but rather localized in
certain hot spots of the country. As observed in the past,
market dynamics usually normalize any excesses and/or
overvaluations in areas that have overshot themselves. Such
regions may either experience flat returns in the future or
may actually go through a correction to adjust for the soaring
returns realized in the last three years.
As we approach 2005, there is a likelihood that mortgage rates will trend upwards.
This by itself could slow the appreciation rate of home prices. In fact, we could
see a reversal of a trend back to single digit numbers, which would be more in line
with the national average.
As investors, finding foreclosures deals in this sizzling market has definitely
been a challenge. The returns have been so strong, that most homeowners in default
have had time to sell the property and walk away with a net profit after paying
what is owed on the home to the bank.
What is evident from these studies is that the hot real estate markets are
localized and not nationwide. As an investor, one may need to “think out of the box.”
Thus, herein lies the opportunity; cities such as the ones listed in the table below
make good candidates for investors to prospect. Finding discounted properties in place
like Irvine, CA or Las Vegas, NV may prove challenging. However, North Carolina is a good
case in point: textile and furniture manufacturing make up for about ten percent of the
states gross revenue. Both these industries have been hard hit by outsourcing due to cheap
labor cost in China and Mexico. However, if we look at Charlotte, it houses some of the
nation’s largest banks. Moreover, Raleigh and Durham are attracting jobs from Silicon Valley
due to lower business cost and of course lower real estate prices. Most recently, Dell
announced plans to construct a new assembly plant in North Carolina. As North Carolina moves
forward to rebuild its economy, investors should look for similar potential opportunities.

Although, it goes beyond saying that due diligence is required before making any
investment decision. Investors should also consider the assistance of a professional
real-estate agent as there are many intricate factors that require serious consideration
before making a purchase.
As we approach 2005, we anticipate foreclosure opportunities to be more prevalent
than in the current market. However, consistent and persistent research will
be required. We at Foreclosure4Sale.com are committed to supporting our clients
with information and data, to help them make better investment decisions.
We would like to wish you a very Happy, Healthy and a Prosperous New Year.
Your team at Foreclosure4Sale.com
Sources:
Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO)
MSN.com
|